Better Than Nothing? Think "Sexual Rosary..."
Holy sexual rosary! Okay, here's cultural complexity at its best. What do you do if you can't take birth control pills, have religious objections to medical birth control, or don't have access to advanced birth control like pills or shots, or even condoms? UNFPA, the United Nations Population Fund, is supporting a program in West Africa that distributes "Cycle Beads," a visual way to keep track of fertile days in the menstrual cycle.
The deluxe beads come in aqua, mauve and copper. The regular ones are brown and white. You count the beads to keep track of your cycle. Of course you recognize this as the rhythm method (and feminists everywhere scream danger! danger!). However, it's been updated by researchers at Georgetown University's Institute for Reproductive Health. (I will remind you that Georgetown is a Catholic, Jesuit institution, so their institute for reproductive health focuses on research that supports Catholic doctrine).
The article from UNFPA describes the program in Senegal and points to some of the advantages and disadvantages in using cycle beads (for example, a husband's willingness to cooperate).
Now, here's the thing: on the one hand, I'd argue for full access to a range of birth control and family planning choices. On the other hand, when contraception choices are limited, perhaps cycle beads are better than nothing. In fact, I think they are better than nothing. UNFPA is clearly invested in family planning and helping women to make choices about a healthy family size and about their own lives and energy as mothers. So, even if a woman becomes pregnant while using the cycle beads, she is already more aware of the concept of family planning, which could then lead to social and political reform for greater choices.
However, the idea of cycle beads is also controversial and a stop gap measure, rather than a true move towards sexual equality. And, of course, it doesn't sufficiently address the rampant HIV infection rates in Sub-Saharan Africa. Senegal, where the article is focused, is a Muslim country with a low rate of HIV infection. Senegal is a very interesting study in a social, cultural, political, and religious response to HIV and AIDS. Muslim and Christian leaders have been incredibly proactive in spreading accurate information about HIV/AIDS prevention. The government has worked hard to raise awareness, to monitor official prostitutes, and to provide medication and treatment to those who have HIV. Youth peer educators walk the streets handing out information and condoms. It's really quite a picture of progress. However, that's not necessarily a full picture. In 2006, in Dakar, rates of HIV infection among sex workers were at almost 21% and in Ziguinchor at almost 30%. One needs only to look at the history of the spread of HIV infection to know that HIV will travel from the sex workers to the husbands to the wives...
And, since the cycle beads depend on a husband's cooperation anyway, then perhaps condoms would be the best choice, especially given the fact that the government supports the use of them and they are accessible.














Yeah, I don't like the sound of that either. On the other hand, it strikes me that in a way this is carrying on of a long tradition in america: I'm thinking of all the religious communities founded such as for the quakers, moravians, etc. And in all honesty, while I'd boycott Dominos and be happy to stay away from that place, if it is a privately owned community, how *does* it differ from, say Bethleham, PA?
cf: http://www.explorepahistory.com/story.php?storyId=5&chapter=2&page=2
In what ways have we changed in the intervening years, if we have, that this is no longer possible? IF people are free to come or to stay there, is there actually a problem?
I dunno. The key element for me here is whether this project is private or public. But really, I don't have any good answers. I find it outrageous, as you do, but in a historical context, I have to wonder...